Cars: Engines Of Racial Inequality?

While cars can be a source of freedom, they can also drive discrimination and inequality. In the United States, where car-based transportation is the dominant mode of travel, racial discrimination in the $1.4 trillion auto loan market and on the roads disproportionately impacts Black Americans. Black drivers face financial burdens that white drivers do not and are more likely to be pulled over, ticketed, searched, and arrested. This has deadly consequences: Black people are about 25% more likely to be killed in a car crash than white people.

Explore related products

Cars and Jails: Freedom Dreams, Debt and Carcerality

$16.73 $17.95

Engine of Inequality: The Fed and the Future of Wealth in America

$29.95 $14.95

Inequality in the 21st Century: A Reader

$54.81 $115

The Urban Political Economy and Ecology of Automobility: Driving Cities, Driving Inequality, Driving Politics (Routledge Studies in Urbanism and the City)

$58.99 $240

Remaking the Heartland: Middle America since the 1950s

$37.05 $39

The Economics of Inequality

$16 $28

Black and Hispanic people face discrimination when buying cars

While cars can be a source of freedom, they can also drive discrimination and perpetuate racial inequality. In the United States, where cars are essential and ubiquitous, racial discrimination is evident in the auto loan market and the process of buying cars.

Additionally, Black and Hispanic people are more likely to live in low-income communities with inadequate roads and infrastructure. As a result, Black pedestrians are twice as likely to be killed while walking, and their fatality rate while cycling is 4.5 times higher than that of white cyclists. Black people, including drivers, are about 25% more likely to be killed in car crashes than white people. These inequalities are further exacerbated by police practices, with Black drivers being pulled over, ticketed, searched, and arrested at higher rates than white drivers.

The impact of racial discrimination in car ownership is far-reaching. For example, driving with a suspended license is the fourth most common charge in New York City, disproportionately affecting Black and Latino drivers. This results in a cycle of fines and fees that further burden already marginalized communities. The knowledge that, as a Black driver, one is more likely to be subjected to police stops and searches contributes to a sense of unease and trauma.

Racial discrimination in car ownership and transportation contributes to the broader issue of racial inequality in American society. While the Civil Rights Movement achieved significant progress, car-based transportation continues to drive racial discrimination and inequality. Historically, the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 displaced majority-Black neighborhoods, leading to economic decline and disinvestment in these communities. Today, Black drivers face unique financial burdens and are subjected to discriminatory practices in auto lending, perpetuating racial inequality.

Explore related products

The Jim Crow Car; Or, Denouncement of injustice meted out to the black race: A Powerful Denouncement of Systemic Injustice

$1.99 $5.95

Open Up the Iron Door: Memoirs of a Soviet Jewry Activist

$24.95 $24.95

Super Fly

$3.79

Intimate Inequalities: Performing Migrant Domestic Work (Performance Works)

$36 $36

Red Clay Suzie

$18.99 $18.99

2 Pack Decorative Square Throw Pillow Cases Velvet Female Pattern Peoples Style Hands Different in Skin Inequality Global Together Color People Hand Cushion Cover 20x20 Inch for Couch Bedroom Car

$18.99

Black drivers are more likely to be pulled over, ticketed, searched, and arrested

While car-based transportation offers freedom, it also perpetuates racial discrimination and inequality. Black drivers are more likely to be pulled over, ticketed, searched, and arrested than white drivers, as evidenced by numerous studies and reports. This disparity in treatment contributes to a sense of vulnerability and unease among Black drivers, who are justifiably concerned about their safety during routine traffic stops.

Research has consistently shown that Black motorists are disproportionately targeted by law enforcement. A comprehensive study by Stanford University analyzed nearly 100 million traffic stops across 21 state patrol agencies and 29 municipal police departments from 2001 to 2017. The findings revealed that Black drivers are, on average, 20% more likely to be pulled over than white drivers, even when controlling for various demographic and gender factors. This racial bias in traffic stops has been further validated by the Stanford Open Policing Project, which has collected and standardized over 200 million records of traffic stop and search data nationwide.

Once stopped, Black drivers face a higher likelihood of being searched, ticketed, and arrested. Studies have found that Black drivers are searched up to twice as often as white drivers, despite being less likely to possess illegal contraband. This indicates a "lower bar" for searches of Black motorists, suggesting that racial bias influences police decision-making during traffic stops. The consequences of these disparities are dire, as illustrated by the high-profile killings of unarmed Black drivers such as Tyre Nichols, Philando Castile, and Walter Scott.

The racial inequalities in policing are further exacerbated by the financial burdens faced by Black drivers. Black Americans are more likely to reside in low-income communities with inadequate roads and infrastructure. They are also subjected to discrimination in auto lending and are overrepresented in arrests for driving with a suspended license, often due to an inability to pay fines and fees. This cycle of debt and criminalization creates a sense of vulnerability and reinforces racial inequality in car culture.

The impact of these issues extends beyond individual experiences. Majority-Black neighborhoods continue to bear the consequences of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, which displaced and isolated communities, leading to disinvestment and economic decline. These systemic issues underscore how car-based transportation intersects with racial inequality, necessitating comprehensive solutions that address both individual and structural forms of discrimination.

Explore related products

Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy

$39.9 $63

Race

$3.79

Race [DVD]

$5.66

Race: A Philosophical Introduction

$20 $24.95

Race [Blu-ray]

$9.89

The Race

$15.95 $15.95

Black people are more likely to live in low-income communities with poor infrastructure

In the United States, car-based transportation is the dominant mode of travel. However, Black Americans are more likely than white Americans to live in low-income communities with poor infrastructure and more dangerous roads. This disparity is partly due to the historical impact of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, which displaced and cut off predominantly African American neighbourhoods, leading to disinvestment and economic decline.

The consequences of these inequalities are deadly. Black pedestrians are more than twice as likely to be killed while walking than white pedestrians, and their fatality rate while cycling is 4.5 times that of white cyclists. Overall, Black people are about 25% more likely to be killed in a car crash than their white counterparts. These inequalities were further exacerbated during the pandemic.

Racial discrimination in auto lending and insurance practices also contribute to the problem. Studies have found evidence of racial discrimination in the auto loan market, with Black and Hispanic borrowers paying higher interest rates, even with similar credit profiles. This discrimination increases the financial burden on Black drivers, who are already more likely to reside in low-income communities.

Furthermore, Black drivers are more likely to be pulled over by police, ticketed, searched, and arrested than white drivers. This reality contributes to a sense of unease and emotional trauma among Black drivers, as they are aware of the potential dangers of police traffic stops. The racial disparities in traffic enforcement further reinforce the cycle of inequality and discrimination experienced by Black Americans.

The correlation between income inequality and car dependence is also evident in research. Cities with higher income inequality tend to have a higher percentage of African American residents. Strategies that promote car ownership and use among disadvantaged communities can perpetuate this cycle of inequality, as marginalized individuals are encouraged to participate in a system that contributes to their marginalization.

Explore related products

The Race to Alaska

$3.99

Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?: And Other Conversations About Race

$10.34 $21.99

The Great Space Race: Mind the Flux

$4.99 $18.99

So You Want to Talk About Race

$10.18 $18.99

Black pedestrians and cyclists are more likely to be killed

Black Americans are more likely to live in low-income communities with more dangerous roads and infrastructure. This inequality is reflected in the fatality rates of Black pedestrians and cyclists, which are significantly higher than those of their white counterparts. Black pedestrians are more than twice as likely to be killed while walking than white pedestrians, and while cycling, their fatality rate is 4.5 times higher than that of white cyclists. The overall fatality rate for Black people in car crashes is about 25% higher than for white people.

The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 is a key example of how car-based transportation policies have historically contributed to racial inequality. The construction of interstate highways through predominantly Black neighbourhoods resulted in the displacement of over a million people and the isolation of those who remained, leading to disinvestment and economic decline. This act continues to have consequences for majority-Black communities, who face challenges in accessing opportunities and resources due to their car-dependent nature.

Additionally, Black drivers face financial burdens that their white counterparts do not. There is evidence of racial discrimination in auto lending, with Black and Hispanic individuals facing higher interest rates and loan markups, contributing to wealth disparities. The impact of these financial burdens is significant, as cars are essential for mobility and opportunity in the United States.

The racial disparities in traffic stops and policing further contribute to the vulnerability of Black pedestrians and cyclists. Black drivers are more likely to be pulled over and, once stopped, are more likely to be ticketed, searched, and arrested. This reality contributes to a sense of unease and trauma for Black drivers, as they are aware that they are more likely to be targeted by law enforcement.

The intersection of car culture and racial inequality is complex and far-reaching. Addressing these inequalities requires a multifaceted approach that considers the historical context, the impact of infrastructure decisions, and the role of discrimination in auto lending and policing.

Black drivers are more likely to have their licenses suspended

Cars are both a source of freedom and a driver of discrimination. While they are the dominant mode of transportation in the United States, racial discrimination in car culture, particularly in auto lending and policing, perpetuates racial inequality.

Racial discrimination in the auto loan market can take various forms. For example, Black borrowers may be charged higher interest rates due to racial animus among auto dealers, even when they have similar credit profiles to white borrowers. This form of illegal discrimination occurs when the loan markup differs based on characteristics such as race, resulting in higher costs for Black borrowers. The impact of these disparities is significant, as auto loans make up a large portion of the debt carried by lower-middle-income (LMI) households, and cars often represent their largest source of wealth. With roughly 60% of Black households in the United States falling into this category, racial discrimination in auto lending contributes to the higher likelihood of Black drivers having their licenses suspended due to non-payment of fines and fees.

Additionally, Black drivers are more likely to be pulled over by police and, once stopped, are more likely to be ticketed, searched, and arrested. This reality contributes to a sense of unease and the fear of being arrested for driving with a suspended license, as expressed by Leisa Moseley-Sayles, a Black driver in Nevada who experienced the challenges of reinstating her license after receiving a ticket. The racial disparities in policing further exacerbate the impact of racial discrimination in auto lending, resulting in a higher likelihood of license suspensions and arrests for Black drivers.

The intersection of racial discrimination in auto lending and policing creates a cycle that disproportionately affects Black drivers. The financial burdens and systemic discrimination faced by Black communities contribute to a higher risk of license suspension and subsequent arrests, perpetuating racial inequality in car culture.

Frequently asked questions