Hydrogen Fuel Cells: The Future Beyond Batteries?

Hydrogen fuel cells are being touted as the next big thing in the automotive industry, but will they replace batteries? Hydrogen fuel cells and battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) are both zero-emission technologies, but they have key differences. Hydrogen fuel cells use a chemical reaction to release the electricity stored in gaseous hydrogen, while BEVs store electricity directly in battery packs. Hydrogen fuel cells offer faster refuelling (in 3 to 5 minutes), longer ranges of around 300 miles, and better efficiency levels. However, they are more expensive and face challenges with distribution and storage. BEVs, on the other hand, are more established, with companies like Tesla leading the way. BEVs also benefit from existing electrical grids that support charging infrastructure. So, while hydrogen fuel cells have advantages, BEVs currently have greater market acceptance and a more developed infrastructure, making them the more practical choice for now.

Hydrogen fuel cells vs batteries: pros and cons

As the world transitions to innovative technologies to reduce its carbon footprint, hydrogen fuel cells and batteries have emerged as viable options. While both technologies have their advantages and disadvantages, the debate surrounding their efficacy and long-term sustainability remains ongoing. Here is a detailed look at the pros and cons of hydrogen fuel cells and batteries.

Pros of Hydrogen Fuel Cells:

• Hydrogen fuel cells offer a longer lifespan compared to lithium-ion batteries, which deteriorate over time and need replacement.
• Hydrogen fuel cells have higher energy storage density, making them lighter and more compact than high-load lithium-ion batteries.
• Hydrogen, the most abundant element in the universe, is the fuel source for fuel cells, whereas batteries rely on scarce materials like lithium, nickel, and cobalt.
• Hydrogen fuel cells have shorter refuelling times, taking only a few minutes, similar to gasoline vehicles.
• Hydrogen fuel cells produce zero harmful emissions, with water being their only byproduct.
• Hydrogen fuel cells have an impressive range, comparable to conventional vehicles, offering around 300 miles on a single tank.
• Hydrogen fuel cells are more efficient at extracting energy from hydrogen than traditional cars are with gasoline or diesel.

Cons of Hydrogen Fuel Cells:

• Hydrogen fuel cells have a smaller refuelling infrastructure, with sparse refuelling locations.
• Developing and maintaining hydrogen fuel cell technology is expensive, and so is storing and transporting hydrogen.
• Hydrogen is highly flammable and explosive, raising safety concerns, especially in the event of a crash.
• The process of producing hydrogen through electrolysis is energy-intensive, and the majority of hydrogen is currently sourced from fossil fuels, creating a carbon footprint.

Pros of Batteries:

• Batteries are more energy-efficient than fuel cells, with lower energy losses during storage, charging, and discharging.
• Batteries can reuse a significant portion of the stored chemical energy, and the lost energy as heat can be utilised for cogeneration, reducing overall energy waste.
• Batteries are a more mature technology, having been in use for over two hundred years, and are widely adopted across various industries.
• Batteries do not store chemical energy in their components, unlike fuel cells, which reduces the risk of explosions.

Cons of Batteries:

• The materials required for lithium-ion batteries, such as lithium, nickel, and cobalt, are in short supply, driving up prices and leading to environmental concerns related to mining.
• Batteries have longer charging times compared to refuelling hydrogen fuel cells, which can be a significant inconvenience for EV owners.
• Batteries have a lower range than hydrogen fuel cells, and commercial vehicles like buses, trucks, and airplanes require specialised charging stations capable of handling higher power outputs.
• Recycling batteries can be challenging and may contribute to CO2 emissions.

In conclusion, both hydrogen fuel cells and batteries have their strengths and weaknesses. Hydrogen fuel cells offer longer lifespans, higher energy density, and shorter refuelling times, but they face challenges with infrastructure, cost, and safety. Batteries, on the other hand, are more energy-efficient, widely adopted, and safer, but they struggle with limited resources, longer charging times, and recycling issues. The choice between the two technologies may depend on specific use cases, with hydrogen fuel cells finding favour in commercial vehicles and batteries dominating the EV market for now.

Hydrogen fuel cells: the future of transport?

The transport industry is currently weighing up the pros and cons of hydrogen fuel cells and battery-electric vehicles. Hydrogen fuel cells are devices that use a source of fuel, such as hydrogen, and an oxidant to create electricity from an electrochemical process. This electricity is then used to power vehicles.

There are several benefits to hydrogen fuel cells. Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, and hydrogen-powered fuel cells are far more energy-efficient than traditional combustion technologies. They also produce much smaller quantities of greenhouse gases and none of the air pollutants that create smog and cause health problems. If pure hydrogen is used as fuel, fuel cells emit only heat and water as a byproduct. Additionally, hydrogen fuel cells can be refuelled much faster than battery-electric vehicles, taking just a few minutes, similar to the current practice of refuelling cars with petrol or diesel.

However, there are also several drawbacks. Hydrogen fuel cells are very expensive, and the infrastructure to support this technology is currently lacking. For example, there are very few places in the UK where hydrogen cars can be refuelled. There are also safety concerns around the production and storage of hydrogen, as it is highly flammable.

So, will hydrogen fuel cells replace batteries as the primary power source for vehicles? The auto industry has not embraced Elon Musk's battery-or-bust vision of the future. A 2017 survey of 1,000 senior auto executives found that 78% believed hydrogen fuel cells have a better long-term future than electric cars. However, others disagree. Volkswagen has come out firmly in favour of batteries, citing a study that found battery-electric cars to be far more efficient than fuel cells.

It seems likely that both technologies will have a role to play in the future of transport. As BMW has stated, various technologies will coexist for some time, and hydrogen fuel cells could be the fourth option after gasoline, diesel, and battery-electric. Hydrogen fuel cells may be particularly well-suited to long-distance heavy-duty transport, aviation, and shipping.

In conclusion, while hydrogen fuel cells offer several advantages over battery-electric vehicles, they also face several challenges that need to be overcome before they can become a widespread power source for transport.

Hydrogen fuel cells: production and distribution challenges

Hydrogen fuel cells are electrical cells that can be continuously fed by fuel. Hydrogen is considered a primary green energy source, and its wide availability and versatile production methods have led to substantial interest from the public, industry, and governments. However, there are challenges to be addressed before hydrogen fuel can be established on an industrial scale. One of the main challenges is from a material perspective, as the behaviour of hydrogen differs from that of natural gas. Hydrogen embrittlement, which can degrade material properties and make them weak, is a key issue for hydrogen-compatible materials.

Hydrogen can be produced from various sources, including fossil fuels, biomass, renewable energy, hydroelectric power, and nuclear energy. The most common method is steam methane reforming (SMR), which uses natural gas sources. Other methods include partial oxidation, autothermal reforming, electrolysis, gasification, and methane splitting. The production of hydrogen has dominated using fossil fuels, but the water electrolysis method has gained interest due to the decreasing cost of renewable power.

There are challenges and opportunities associated with hydrogen production, transmission, storage, and infrastructure. For example, the design of hydrogen fuel cells must be dedicated and specific for a hydrogen environment. Additionally, the high pressure used to store hydrogen can have effects on the plasticization of polymers. Furthermore, hydrogen embrittlement is a concern for hydrogen infrastructures, and the design of storage and transport facilities must be expensive and alloy-specific to be safe.

Hydrogen fuel cells: cost and safety concerns

Hydrogen fuel cells have the potential to replace batteries as they can provide environmentally friendly transport with almost unlimited green energy. However, there are several cost and safety concerns associated with hydrogen fuel cells that need to be addressed.

Cost Concerns

One of the main cost concerns with hydrogen fuel cells is the high cost of developing the technology. Producing, storing, and moving hydrogen is expensive. The electricity used to produce hydrogen must be renewable for there to be any carbon dioxide (CO2) advantage, which is not always the case. Additionally, the process of converting hydrogen into electricity within a fuel cell is inherently inefficient, with a significant amount of energy lost in transmission and conversion. As a result, the overall ownership costs of fuel-cell cars are predicted to be higher than those of battery-electric cars.

However, some argue that the cost of hydrogen fuel cells will become more competitive as production volumes increase and the infrastructure for distribution and storage improves. Reports and studies also predict reductions in the price of fuel and fueling infrastructure due to scaling up and standardization.

Safety Concerns

Hydrogen fuel cells also present several safety concerns. Hydrogen is a highly flammable gas that can cause fires and explosions if not handled properly. Detecting a hydrogen leak is challenging because hydrogen is colorless, odorless, and tasteless. By the time a worker detects a leak through other means, the hydrogen concentration may have already exceeded its lower flammability limit. Additionally, hydrogen fires burn with a nearly invisible flame, making them difficult to detect and extinguish.

To ensure the safe use of hydrogen, adequate ventilation and leak detection systems are required. Special flame detectors are also necessary. Training in safe hydrogen handling practices and the design of safety features into hydrogen systems are also crucial. While hydrogen has some properties that make it safer to handle than traditional fuels, such as its non-toxic nature and rapid dispersal in the event of a leak, its safe use still requires careful engineering controls and guidelines.

In conclusion, while hydrogen fuel cells offer environmental benefits, addressing the cost and safety concerns associated with their production, distribution, and use is essential for them to become a viable alternative to batteries.

Hydrogen fuel cells: the manufacturer landscape

Hydrogen fuel cells are an alternative to battery-powered electric vehicles, and they are gaining traction. While the two technologies are similar, fuel cells store electricity in gaseous hydrogen, which is then released through a chemical reaction in the cells.

The debate is ongoing as to whether hydrogen fuel cells will replace batteries, but there are several advantages to hydrogen fuel cells. Hydrogen fuel cells have faster refuelling times, taking only 3-5 minutes, and they have an impressive range of around 300 miles, on par with conventional vehicles. Hydrogen fuel cells also have good efficiency levels, as they are much more efficient at getting energy out of hydrogen than traditional cars are at getting energy from gasoline or diesel.

However, there are also some drawbacks to hydrogen fuel cells. Refuelling locations are sparse, and the cost of developing the technology, as well as storing and moving hydrogen, is high.

Despite these challenges, several manufacturers are investing in hydrogen fuel cell technology. Some of the key players in the hydrogen fuel cell market include:

• Toyota, with its Mirai hydrogen fuel cell family car
• Honda, with its Clarity Fuel Cell vehicle
• Hyundai, with its Nexo model
• BMW, with its i Hydrogen NEXT concept car
• Daimler, which has announced a deal with Volvo Trucks to develop fuel cell technology for heavy-duty vehicles
• FuelCell Energy, which provides platforms to help organizations transform their energy strategies while staying true to net-zero commitments
• Emerson, which offers hydrogen fuel cell solutions for clean energy, including pressure control solutions and valves to maximize efficiency, safety, and reliability
• Ballard Fuel Cells
• Bloom Energy Server
• Doosan Fuel Cell America
• GenCell
• Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
• BalticFuelCells GmbH

While the future of hydrogen fuel cells is uncertain, these manufacturers are leading the way in developing and commercializing the technology.

Frequently asked questions