
The amount of fuel used by planes during take-off is a small fraction of the total fuel used during a flight. However, take-off is the most intense point of a flight in terms of fuel consumption, with engines working their hardest and burning the most fuel. The amount of fuel burnt during take-off depends on several factors, including the aircraft's empty weight, payload, engine efficiency, flight path, and weather conditions. For instance, a Boeing 747 burns around 10-11 tons of jet fuel per hour, while shorter flights using a Boeing 737-800 burn about 2.5-3 tons per hour. The Airbus A380, the largest passenger aircraft, consumes about 4,600 gallons of fuel per hour, with a maximum fuel capacity of 500,000 pounds.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Fuel burn during different flight stages | Take-off, climb, cruise, approach, taxi in, and taxi out |
| Fuel burn during the shortest and longest flights | Shorter flights have a higher proportion of non-cruising fuel burn. During the longest flight to Hong Kong, cruising uses up 96% of the total fuel burned. |
| Fuel efficiency based on aircraft type | The A350 to Hong Kong uses 6.0 litres of fuel per kilometre, while the A319 to Paris uses 14 litres of fuel per kilometre. The A321neo, one of the newest aircraft, uses 2.7 litres of fuel per kilometre. |
| Fuel efficiency based on the number of engines | Modern twin jets are more fuel-efficient than quadjets. |
| Fuel efficiency based on the number of passengers | A 747 transporting 500 people 1 mile uses 5 gallons of fuel, resulting in 0.01 gallons per person per mile. |
| Fuel consumption rate | A Boeing 747-400 burns 10-11 tons (approximately 22,000-24,000 pounds) of jet fuel per hour. |
| Fuel consumption for long-haul flights | A 777 FO may bring 300,000 pounds of fuel for long-haul flights. |
| Fuel consumption for an 8-hour flight | 80,000-90,000 kg or 10 tons/hour |
| Fuel consumption for a 5-hour flight | A Boeing 747 burns 18,000 gallons of fuel during a 5-hour flight. The Airbus A380 consumes 23,000 gallons of jet fuel during a 5-hour flight. |
| Fuel consumption for a transatlantic flight | A transatlantic flight from New York to London, approximately 3,451 nautical miles, requires around 36,000 gallons (136,275 litres) of fuel for a Boeing 747-400. |
| Fuel consumption for a flight from New York City to Los Angeles | 112 gallons (509 litres) of gas |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn

Fuel efficiency innovations are important
The aviation industry is under pressure to reduce its environmental impact and carbon footprint. While flying is an incredibly efficient way to travel, the carbon emissions from burning jet fuel contribute significantly to global warming. The demand for air travel is increasing, and with it, the number of aircraft in the global fleet, which is expected to grow by 20,930 aircraft to reach about 40,000 in total by 2032. This projected growth in the industry could see its share of global emissions increase to 22% by 2050.
Aircraft manufacturers have been working to improve fuel efficiency through a variety of methods, including the use of lighter materials, improved engines, and enhanced aerodynamics. For example, winglets mounted at the tip of the wings can improve aerodynamic efficiency, creating additional thrust and reducing drag. Manufacturers are also exploring the use of electric and hybrid-electric aircraft, as well as alternative fuels such as synthetic fuels from algae.
Fuel efficiency is also important from a cost perspective. Aviation fuel is expensive, heavy, and takes up significant storage space. By improving fuel efficiency, airlines can reduce their fuel costs and increase their range and maximum load capacity. Additionally, avoiding the use of aviation fuel for taxiing can bring benefits in terms of cost, health and safety, and engine wear and tear.
Overall, fuel efficiency innovations are important for reducing emissions, improving aircraft performance, and lowering costs. With new technologies and designs, the aviation industry can work towards a more sustainable future.
The 787's Fuel Capacity: An Overview
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Fuel burn differs across flight stages
Fuel burn does indeed differ across flight stages. Take-off, climb, cruise, approach, and taxi are the various stages of a flight. Although the engines are at their maximum thrust during take-off, the fuel burned during this stage is a relatively small fraction of the total fuel used. The shorter the flight, the more the non-cruising elements of the flight contribute to total fuel use.
For instance, on a long-haul flight from London Heathrow to Hong Kong, cruising accounted for 96% of the total fuel burned. In contrast, for a short-haul flight to Edinburgh, cruising accounted for 68% of the total fuel burn. The Dubai flight, which is not the longest flight, burns the most fuel among the flights analysed.
Cruising consumes the most fuel, especially on longer flights. This is because the plane spends the majority of its time in this stage, flying at a constant speed and altitude. Cruising altitudes offer thinner air, reducing drag and allowing engines to operate more efficiently. However, natural phenomena like turbulence and headwinds can increase fuel consumption as engines need to be throttled up to navigate through these rough patches.
The contribution of taxiing, take-off, climb, approach, and taxi-in to total fuel burn is not insignificant for short-haul flights. For example, if the fuel use associated with taxiing for a Paris flight doubled, then taxiing would increase from 17% to 25% of total fuel use.
The amount of cargo, passengers, and fuel on board significantly affects fuel consumption. Heavier take-off weights require more thrust, increasing the burn rate during take-off and climb. Aircraft type also plays a role in fuel efficiency, with newer models like the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 having more fuel-efficient engines and aerodynamics.
Cleaner Energy: Nuclear vs Fossil Fuels
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Fuel costs are staggering for carriers
The amount of fuel burned depends on a multitude of factors, including the type and size of the aircraft, the flight route, the aircraft's empty weight, the payload, the efficiency of the engines, and even the weather conditions. For example, a Boeing 747-400 burns around 10-11 tons (approximately 22,000-24,000 pounds) of jet fuel per hour, while shorter flights using a Boeing 737-800 use about 2.5-3 tons (5,500-6,600 pounds) per hour. The largest passenger aircraft, the Airbus A380, consumes even more fuel, with a maximum fuel capacity of 500,000 pounds, and burning about 4,600 gallons of fuel per hour.
While cruising accounts for the majority of fuel burned on long-haul flights, the contribution of taxiing, taking off, climbing, and other non-cruising elements are not insignificant, especially for shorter flights. For example, on a flight to Paris, cruising accounted for 62% of the overall fuel burn, while taxiing used 17% of the total fuel.
The number of people on board also affects the fuel efficiency of a flight. A full flight will be more fuel-efficient per person than a half-empty one. For instance, a Boeing 747 carrying 500 people is burning 0.01 gallons per person per mile, or 27 gallons of fuel per person for a 6-hour flight. However, with only 200 people on board, that number doubles to 54 gallons per person for the same flight.
With such large amounts of fuel required for aviation, it is an area where transitioning away from fossil fuels would be beneficial, but also challenging and expensive. While alternatives like biodiesel from algae exist, they are not yet economically viable without subsidies and mandates to increase demand and scale of production.
The World's Remaining Aviation Fuel: How Long Will It Last?
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Jet fuel prices have risen
The cost of jet fuel has a significant impact on the aviation industry, and fluctuations in fuel prices can have a ripple effect on airlines and passengers alike. While take-off is a critical phase of flight in terms of fuel consumption, the overall fuel usage and costs are influenced by various factors, including flight distance, aircraft type, capacity, age, and engine type.
The law of supply and demand also plays a role in the rising jet fuel prices. When supply decreases and demand remains constant or increases, prices tend to rise. In the context of jet fuel, this can occur due to various factors, such as refinery maintenance or disruptions in the supply chain. Additionally, the profitability of jet fuel compared to other refined products can influence supply levels and prices. When the profit margins for jet fuel are higher, refineries may prioritize its production, increasing supply and potentially stabilizing prices.
The cost of jet fuel is a significant expense for airlines, and rising prices can have a direct impact on their operations and financial health. Airlines may choose to pass on these increased costs to passengers in the form of higher ticket prices or additional fuel surcharges. Alternatively, they may absorb the costs themselves, potentially impacting their profitability and ability to invest in new aircraft, technologies, or improvements to fuel efficiency.
The rise in jet fuel prices underscores the importance of exploring alternative fuels and technologies in the aviation industry. While synthetic fuels derived from algae or other sustainable sources have been proposed, they face challenges in terms of cost and scalability. Nevertheless, with the unpredictability of fossil fuel prices and growing concerns about climate change, there is a renewed sense of urgency to accelerate the transition to more sustainable aviation fuels and reduce the industry's reliance on jet fuel.
Fuel Costs for a 50-Mile Trip: How Much?
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Regulatory procedures are in place
Firstly, airlines must adhere to strict guidelines regarding fuel usage due to the large volumes of fuel involved. These guidelines are similar worldwide, providing a consistent framework for the industry. Under FAA and EASA regulations, the captain of an aircraft is ultimately responsible for ensuring sufficient fuel before takeoff. This responsibility includes complying with stipulations on contingency fuel, which requires a minimum of 5% additional fuel on top of the total fuel needed for the trip. Aircraft like the A350 can carry over 37,000 gallons, highlighting the significance of proper fuel management.
The regulatory procedures also acknowledge the impact of fuel costs on airline operations. Jet fuel expenses can account for 25-40% of an airline's operating expenses, influencing ticket prices for passengers. Fuel prices have risen in recent years, impacted by various factors, including the war in Ukraine. As a result, fuel hedging strategies have emerged to protect airlines from extreme price fluctuations.
Additionally, sustainability and climate change concerns have brought CO2 emissions and the use of fossil fuels into the spotlight. Regulatory procedures encourage the development and adoption of fuel-efficient aircraft to mitigate these environmental impacts. For example, modern twin jets are significantly more efficient than quadjets, reducing fuel consumption and associated emissions.
Furthermore, regulatory procedures consider the impact of delays on fuel usage. Delays can lead to increased fuel consumption during taxiing, affecting cost, health and safety, and engine wear and tear. Therefore, efficient ground operations and on-time performance are crucial for optimising fuel usage and reducing unnecessary expenses and environmental impacts.
Overall, these regulatory procedures related to fuel usage aim to ensure safe and cost-effective aircraft operations while also addressing the environmental implications of fuel consumption in aviation. By following these procedures, airlines can contribute to a more sustainable and efficient industry.
How Much Diesel Additive is Too Much?
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
A transatlantic flight from New York to London, covering approximately 3,451 nautical miles, would require around 36,000 gallons (136,275 litres) of fuel for a Boeing 747-400.
While take-off is the most intense point of a flight in terms of fuel consumption, it only accounts for a small fraction of the total fuel used. The amount of fuel burned during take-off depends on various factors, including the aircraft's empty weight, payload, engine efficiency, flight path, and weather conditions.
A Boeing 747 transporting 500 people one mile burns five gallons of fuel, resulting in 0.01 gallons per person per mile. In comparison, a typical car achieves 25 miles per gallon.
The Airbus A380, the largest passenger aircraft, can carry over 800 passengers and burns approximately 4,600 gallons of fuel per hour.










































