Sylvie Willis
The Boeing 767 is a highly versatile and reliable aircraft that has been serving the commercial aviation industry for decades. With its range of configurations, long-range capabilities, and fuel efficiency, it is well-suited for both passenger and cargo operations. The 767's fuel capacity and engine specifications have been a key focus of its design, with Boeing targeting a 20 to 30 percent cost saving compared to previous aircraft. The 767-300 variant has a total fuel capacity of 20,112 Imperial gallons (91,380 litres/73,078 kg), with a fuel consumption of around 1,199 Imperial gallons (5,451 litres/4,360 kg) per hour for short-haul flights and 1,279 Imperial gallons (5,813 litres/4,650 kg) per hour for long-haul/regional flights. The extended-range model, the 767-200ER, offers even greater fuel capacity and range, capable of travelling up to 6,385 nautical miles (11,825 km; 7,348 mi).
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Fuel capacity | 20,112 Imperial gallons (91,380 litres/73,078 kgs) |
| Fuel consumption (shorthaul) | 1,199 Imperial gallons (5,451 litres/4,360 kgs) per hour |
| Fuel consumption (long-haul/regional) | 1,279 Imperial gallons (5,813 litres/4,650 kgs) per hour |
| Total fuel capacity of 767-300ER | 24,140 gallons or 161,800 pounds |
| Fuel capacity of two wing tanks | 6,070 gallons or 40,700 pounds |
| Fuel capacity of center tank | 12,000 gallons or 80,400 pounds |
| Maximum thrust output | 48,000 pounds-force (210 kN) |
| Range | 3,850 nautical miles (7,130 km; 4,430 mi) |
| Number of engines | 2 |
| Seating capacity | 181 to 375 passengers |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
Fuel capacity of 767-300s: 20,112 gallons
The fuel capacity of a 767-300 aircraft with RB211-524H engines is 20,112 gallons (or 91,380 litres/73,078 kg) of fuel. This is a significant amount, and the 767 was designed with an emphasis on fuel efficiency. The twin-engine configuration of the 767 makes it more fuel-efficient than older, four-engine aircraft, reducing operational costs for airlines.
The 767 was one of the first wide-body aircraft to be ETOPS (Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards) certified, allowing it to fly long overwater routes with just two engines. This was a significant advancement for commercial aviation. The 767's larger wings were designed with an aft-loaded shape, reducing aerodynamic drag and distributing lift more evenly. This wing design also provided higher-altitude cruise performance and room for future expansion.
The 767's fuel efficiency is also due in part to its fuselage width, which, at 16.5 feet, is narrower than previous wide-body designs, producing less aerodynamic drag. The 767's initial design targeted a 20 to 30 per cent cost saving over earlier aircraft, and its fuel efficiency has contributed to its long service life and continued relevance in a rapidly evolving aviation market.
The 767-300's fuel capacity of 20,112 gallons can be compared to the 767-300ER's total fuel capacity of 24,140 gallons. The 767-400ERX, a proposed variant that was ultimately cancelled, would have offered even greater range and fuel efficiency, with a tailplane fuel tank boosting its range by 5,990 to 6,490 nautical miles.
Smart Fuel Savings: How Much Can You Keep?
You may want to see also
Explore related products
Fuel efficiency: 20-30% saving
The Boeing 767 is a twin-engine aircraft that is more fuel-efficient than older, four-engine planes. Its fuel efficiency can be improved by 20-30% through a variety of methods. Firstly, the weight of the aircraft is a significant factor in fuel efficiency. A lighter airframe generates less drag, and modern materials and construction methods can reduce weight. A reduction in airframe weight also allows for smaller, lighter engines, further reducing fuel consumption.
Another way to improve the fuel efficiency of the 767 is through aerodynamics. By improving the aerodynamics of the aircraft, drag can be reduced, and fuel efficiency increased. This can be achieved through the use of advanced materials and systems, as well as retrofitting older models with more efficient components.
The efficiency of the engines themselves also plays a role in overall fuel efficiency. New technologies such as higher pressure and bypass ratios, geared turbofans, open rotors, and hybrid or fully electric propulsion can all reduce engine fuel consumption. Additionally, the 767's autopilot systems can be optimized for fuel efficiency, and modern cockpit displays can provide real-time data to help pilots make fuel-efficient decisions.
Finally, operational procedures can have a significant impact on fuel efficiency. Efficient maintenance and routing can save fuel, and flying at optimum altitudes and airspeeds can improve fuel economy. By combining these various methods, it is possible to achieve a 20-30% improvement in fuel efficiency for the Boeing 767.
Colombia's Drug Trade: Economic Impact and Legacy
You may want to see also
Explore related products
Engines: Pratt & Whitney JT9D or GE CF6 turbofans
The Boeing 767 aircraft has a fuel capacity of 20,112 imperial gallons (91,380 litres or 73,078 kg). The short-haul fuel consumption of the aircraft is 1,199 imperial gallons (5,451 litres or 4,360 kg) per hour, while the long-haul/regional fuel consumption is 1,279 imperial gallons (5,813 litres or 4,650 kg) per hour.
The Boeing 767 is powered by either the Pratt & Whitney JT9D engine or the GE CF6 turbofan engine. The JT9D engine was the first high bypass ratio jet engine to power a wide-body airliner. It was first tested in December 1966 and received FAA certification in 1969. The engine entered service in 1970 on the Boeing 747 and subsequently powered the Boeing 767. The JT9D engine family consists of three distinct series: the JT9D-7, JT9D-7Q, and the later -7R4 series. The -7 series covers a thrust range of 46,300 to 50,000 lbf, while the JT9D-7Q series has a 53,000 lbf thrust rating. The -7R4 series covers a thrust range of 48,000 to 56,000 lbf. The JT9D engine introduced advanced technologies in structures, aerodynamics, and materials, including titanium and nickel alloys, to improve fuel efficiency and reliability compared to previous turbofan engines.
The GE CF6 engine, on the other hand, is a high-bypass turbofan engine produced by GE Aviation. It is based on the TF39, the first high-power high-bypass jet engine. The CF6 engine entered service in 1971 and has powered various civilian airliners, including the Boeing 767. The CF6-80 series are high-bypass turbofan engines with a thrust range of 48,000 to 75,000 lbf. The CF6-80A3, a variant of the CF6-80, powered the twinjet Boeing 767 and entered airline service in 1982. The CF6 engine is gradually being replaced by the newer GEnx family of engines.
The High Cost of Fueling Cargo Ships
You may want to see also
Explore related products
Fuel burn: 3% lower for 767-400ERX
The Boeing 767 is a highly versatile and reliable aircraft that has been serving the commercial aviation industry for decades. It is known for its fuel efficiency, range, and versatility, making it suitable for both passenger and cargo operations.
The 767 was designed as a smaller replacement for the popular Boeing 747, featuring a widebody layout that could seat between 181 to 375 passengers, depending on the configuration. The twin-engine configuration of the 767 made it more fuel-efficient than older, four-engine aircraft, and it was also one of the first wide-body aircraft to be ETOPS (Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards) certified, allowing it to fly long overwater routes with just two engines.
The 767-400ERX was a planned variant of the 767 that was intended to offer even greater fuel efficiency and range. It was to have a capacity of 259 seats and an increased range of 5,990 to 6,490 nautical miles (11,100 to 12,025 km). This extended range was to be achieved through a combination of design changes, including a strengthened wing, fuselage, and landing gear, as well as more fuel-efficient engines.
However, the 767-400ERX was ultimately cancelled by Boeing in 2001 due to a variety of factors, including competition from the Airbus A330-200, which offered increased capacity and range, and the timing of its development cycle. Despite its cancellation, the 767-400ERX was designed to offer a 3% lower fuel burn and costs when compared to the Airbus A330-200, demonstrating Boeing's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency and performance of the 767 family of aircraft.
Idling Cars: Fuel Consumption and Environmental Impact
You may want to see also
Explore related products
Design: Computer-aided, wind tunnel tests
The Boeing 767 is a highly versatile and reliable aircraft that has been serving the commercial aviation industry for decades. The 767 was designed with a strong emphasis on fuel efficiency, with Boeing targeting a 20 to 30 percent cost saving compared to previous aircraft. This was achieved through the use of high-bypass-ratio turbofan engines, careful aerodynamic design, and computer-aided design (CAD) techniques.
Computer-aided design played a crucial role in the development of the 767, with over a third of the design drawings being created using CAD tools. These computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools allowed engineers to test and refine various design configurations virtually before building physical prototypes. This not only accelerated the design process but also helped reduce development costs.
To further enhance the aircraft's performance and fuel efficiency, Boeing conducted extensive wind tunnel tests on the 767. Engineers spent approximately 26,000 hours refining the aerodynamic design of the aircraft, ensuring optimal performance and stability. The wind tunnel tests helped engineers verify their calculations, identify areas for improvement, and reduce drag while increasing lift.
The careful aerodynamic design of the 767 is evident in its aft-loaded wing shape, which reduces aerodynamic drag and distributes lift more evenly. Additionally, the location of the engines under the wing, rather than to the rear of the fuselage, helps minimize pitching-moment nonlinearities. These design features, coupled with new flight management techniques, contribute to the 767's exceptional fuel efficiency.
The combination of computer-aided design and wind tunnel tests played a pivotal role in the successful development of the Boeing 767. By utilizing these advanced technologies, engineers were able to create an aircraft with superior fuel efficiency, performance, and stability, solidifying the 767's place as a landmark aircraft in the history of commercial aviation.
Fuel Injector Cost: How Much Does it Really Cost?
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
The fuel capacity of a 767 engine depends on the variant. The 767-300 has a fuel capacity of 20,112 imperial gallons (91,380 litres/73,078 kg). The 767-300ER has a total of 24,140 gallons or 161,800 pounds. The 767-400ERX, which was planned for delivery in 2004, would have had an additional fuel tank of 2,145 US gallons (8,120 litres) in the horizontal tail.
The 767's design emphasised fuel efficiency, with Boeing targeting a 20 to 30 percent cost saving over earlier aircraft. The 767 is also one of the first wide-body aircraft to be ETOPS (Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards) certified, allowing it to fly long overwater routes with only two engines.
The fuel consumption of a 767-300 on a short-haul flight is 1,199 imperial gallons (5,451 litres/4,360 kg) per hour.
The fuel consumption of a 767-300 on a long-haul or regional flight is 1,279 imperial gallons (5,813 litres/4,650 kg) per hour.
