Meat's Climate Impact: The Costly Truth

The meat industry is responsible for a significant portion of global greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate change. According to the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the global livestock industry accounts for about 14.5% of all annual industrial greenhouse gas emissions, higher than the entire transportation sector. This includes emissions from animal digestion, manure management, and nitrogen fertilizer used in feed production.

The meat industry's impact on the environment extends beyond greenhouse gas emissions. Deforestation, driven by the need for livestock grazing and feed crop cultivation, has devastating consequences for biodiversity and ecosystems. Additionally, the meat industry relies heavily on water resources, contributing to water scarcity.

Reducing meat consumption is one way to mitigate the environmental impact of the meat industry. Studies suggest that a shift towards plant-based diets can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and preserve natural habitats and biodiversity.

Livestock farming produces methane and nitrous oxide

Methane Emissions from Livestock Farming

Methane emissions from livestock farming are primarily produced during enteric fermentation, which occurs in the digestive process of ruminants such as cattle and sheep. During this process, ruminants emit methane, a potent greenhouse gas, through burping. In fact, over 90% of enteric methane from cattle is emitted through burping, rather than flatulence.

Methane is also emitted from manure, with solid waste producing both methane and nitrous oxide. Different systems for manure management generate varying levels of emissions, with methane emissions typically highest when manure is stored in liquid systems such as manure lagoons.

Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Livestock Farming

Nitrous oxide, another powerful greenhouse gas, is emitted from ruminant waste on pastures and from the use of chemical fertilizers on crops produced for cattle feed.

The Impact of Livestock Farming on Climate Change

Livestock farming is a significant contributor to global warming and climate change. According to the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), livestock production accounted for about 14.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2013. More recent estimates place this figure at around 11-17%, with peer-reviewed studies putting the figure even higher, at up to 19.6%.

The impact of livestock farming on climate change is not limited to methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Livestock farming also contributes to climate change through land-use change, as the expansion of pasture for grazing animals and cropland for growing feed crops results in the conversion of forests, grasslands, and other land, releasing stored carbon dioxide.

Reducing Livestock Emissions

Reducing livestock emissions is crucial in mitigating the impact of the agriculture sector on climate change. This can be achieved through various means, such as improving feed quality and veterinary care, selective breeding of animals that convert feed more efficiently, and implementing improved management practices like rotational grazing.

Additionally, shifting towards more sustainable diets that include less meat and more plant-based alternatives can significantly reduce emissions. According to research, if ruminant meat consumption in high-consuming countries was reduced to about 50 calories a day, it would nearly eliminate the need for additional agricultural expansion and associated deforestation.

Manure management and nitrogen fertiliser used in feed production

The meat industry's manure management and nitrogen fertiliser use in feed production have significant environmental impacts, contributing to climate change.

Manure Management

The meat industry's manure management practices can have detrimental effects on the environment, particularly through the release of harmful substances and greenhouse gases. When not properly managed, manure can contaminate surrounding waterways and the environment. For instance, manure is often stored in open lagoons susceptible to overflow during flooding or leakage, leading to the release of antibiotics, bacteria, pesticides, and heavy metals. As manure decomposes, it emits methane, ammonia, and carbon dioxide, which are potent greenhouse gases.

Nitrogen Fertiliser Used in Feed Production

Nitrogen fertiliser use in feed production for livestock has environmental consequences, primarily in the form of greenhouse gas emissions. The manufacturing and application of nitrogen fertiliser contribute to these emissions. During manufacturing, ammonia production requires high temperatures and pressures, relying mostly on fossil fuels like coal and methane gas, which produce carbon dioxide emissions. After application, crops only absorb about half of the nitrogen in fertilisers, with the rest running off into waterways or being broken down by soil microbes, releasing nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas.

To address these issues, scientists and engineers are working on reducing the temperature and pressure needed for ammonia production, making it more sustainable and accessible to farmers in developing nations. Additionally, there is a need to reduce fertiliser use without sacrificing crop yields by using slow-release fertilisers, changing application timing, and employing sensors to monitor nutrient absorption. Europe has taken steps in this direction, aiming to cut fertiliser use by a quarter over the next decade as part of its sustainability efforts.

Meat production requires a lot of water

The Water Footprint Network (WFN) estimates that it takes around 1,800 gallons of water to produce one pound of boneless beef. This is because 98% of the water used in beef production goes towards watering the grass, forage and feed that cattle consume over their lifetime. In comparison, it takes 220 gallons of water to produce one pound of wheat, and 260 gallons to produce one pound of soy.

The WFN's water use statistics are based on industrial livestock production, where cattle are confined and fed a high-grain finishing diet. In these systems, grain production requires a lot of water. In the US, at least 80% of beef cattle are "conventionally" raised, meaning they spend six months grazing on pasture before going to a feedlot for four to six months.

In contrast, pasture-based systems rely mainly on rainwater and are, therefore, preferable from a water resources point of view. They also pose less of a pollution threat to freshwater sources, as they do not produce the same volume of manure as industrial systems, nor do they require the same level of fertilizers and pesticides in feed crop production.

The global demand for meat is rising, and with it, the pressure on water resources. Meat production is under scrutiny for its associated water use, especially in regions experiencing frequent drought conditions.

According to the WFN, other meats also require significant amounts of water to produce: one pound of pork requires 720 gallons of water, goat requires 660 gallons, and chicken requires 520 gallons.

Meat is a driver of deforestation

Forests play a critical role in mitigating climate change, but they are disappearing at an alarming rate. One of the main causes of deforestation is the increasing demand for animal agriculture, particularly beef production.

The Impact of Beef Production on Deforestation

Beef production is a major driver of deforestation, with forests being cleared to create new pastureland for cattle grazing. According to research, beef is responsible for 36% of all agriculture-linked forest replacement. Between 2001 and 2015, an estimated 45.1 million hectares of land were deforested for cattle pasture, a rate five times higher than for any other product. The Amazon rainforest, one of the most biodiverse regions on Earth, has been heavily impacted by beef production, with over half of the deforestation in the region attributed to pastureland in the last two decades.

The Role of Soy Production in Deforestation

Soy production, used largely as animal feed, is the second-largest driver of deforestation. From 2001 to 2015, soy production resulted in the destruction of 8.2 million hectares of forests. While soy is used to feed a variety of animals, its production has a significant impact on the beef industry as it is often used to feed cattle.

The Environmental Consequences of Deforestation

Deforestation has severe consequences for wildlife and their habitats, leading to the extinction of species that are unique to specific regions. Approximately 80% of terrestrial species live in forests, and deforestation is a major contributor to the current mass extinction of species. Additionally, deforestation increases the risk of wildfires, causing suffering and displacement for both wildlife and pets.

Addressing Deforestation

To address the issue of deforestation driven by meat production, several solutions have been proposed. These include reducing meat consumption, particularly in high-income societies, and implementing policies to protect and restore forests. Technological advancements, such as meat substitutes and cultured meat products, also offer promising alternatives to traditional meat production methods.

Factory farming is a source of water pollution

Factory farming is a major source of water pollution. In the US, factory farms are responsible for 55% of water consumption, whereas domestic water use makes up only 5%. Globally, factory farming uses 16% of the planet's freshwater.

The waste from factory farms is stored in vast cesspools or collects in pits under the animals until it is spread, untreated, on fields as fertiliser. These cesspools are prone to leaks, and farmers may also drain them by spraying the waste onto neighbouring lands. This waste is so polluted with antibiotics, hormones, and bacteria that it cannot be returned to the water system.

Factory farms contaminate waterways across the country. Without strong regulations, they have no reason to manage their waste responsibly. Many collect their waste in lagoons, which are often unlined, open-air pits containing urine, blood, faeces, pathogens, pharmaceuticals, and even heavy metals. By design, these lagoons leak and pollute groundwater, which can harm residents reliant on well water and often flow into nearby surface waters.

Factory farms also over-apply their waste to fields as fertiliser, at rates that may be good for maximising crop yield but are dangerous to water quality. As well as the health hazards this poses, the excess nitrogen and phosphorus from manure cause massive algae blooms that take up all the water's oxygen, killing all other marine life.

Factory farming is an inefficient and resource-intensive way to feed our growing global population. It is a leading contributor to climate change, responsible for about 15.4% of global greenhouse gas emissions. That's nearly as much as the entire global transportation sector.

Frequently asked questions